විකිපීඩියා:මකා දැමීමේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය

මෙම පිටුව ඉංග්‍රීසි විකිපීඩියාවේ නිල ප්‍රතිපත්තිවල සිංහල පරිවර්ථනයක් ලෙස ආරම්භ කරණලදී. ඉංග්‍රීසි විකිපීඩියාවේ පරිශීලකයන් අතර මේ පිලිබඳ පුළුල් පිලිගැනීමක් ඇති අතර එහි සියළු පරිශීලකයන් පිලිපැදියයුතු සම්මතය ලෙස සැලකේ. මෙම පිටුව සංස්කරණය කරන විට, කරැණාකාර ඔබගේ සංශෝධනය පොදු එකඟත්වය මත පැවරෙනවාදැයි සහතික කරන්න. දෙගිඩියාවෙන් සිටින විට, ප්‍රථමයෙන් සාකච්ජා පිටුවෙහි සාකච්ජා කර සිටින්න.

විකිපීඩියාවේ මකා දැමීමේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය මගින් විස්තර කරන්නේ අදාල මිණුම්දඬු වලට අනුකූල නොවන අන්තර්ගතයන් හඳුනාගෙන විකිපීඩියා විශ්වකෝශයෙන් ඉවත්කරන ක්‍රමයයි. In the normal operations of Wikipedia, approximately five thousand pages are deleted each day through the processes outlined below.

Deletion of a Wikipedia article removes the current version and all previous versions from public view. Unlike page blanking, which can be performed (or reverted) by any user, deletion can be performed only by administrators. Administrators can also view deleted pages and reverse ("undelete") any deletion. All such actions are logged. If in doubt as to whether there is consensus to delete a page, administrators will normally not delete it.

මකා දැමීමට හේතු

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):

• මකා දැමීමේ උපමානය (criteria for speedy deletion)ට යටත් වන අවම වශයෙන් එක් කරුණක්වත් පැවතීම.
• Copyright violations (ප්‍රකාශන හිමිකම් කඩ කිරීම්) සහ විකිපීඩියාවෙහි non-free content criteria (නිදහස්-නොවන අන්තර්ගතයන් පිලිබඳ උපමානය) උල්ලංඝණය කරන අනෙකුත් දෑ
• කුපිත කරවන redirects (නැවත යොමු කිරීම්), pages that exist only to disparage their subject (අදාළ මාතෘකාවට නිග්‍රහ කිරීම පමණක් සිදු කරමින් පවතින පිටු), patent nonsense (පැහැදිලිව පෙනෙන විකාර/අර්ථ ශුන්‍යයන්) හෝ අනංමනං දෙඩවිල්ල/පල්හෑලි/තේරුමක් නොමැති දෑ ඇතුළත්ව සිදුවන Vandalism (නාශකවාදය)
• Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
• Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate)
• Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)
• Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
• Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
• Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons
• Redundant or otherwise useless templates
• Categories representing overcategorization
• Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the Non-free policy
• Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace.
• Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia

මකා දැමීම වෙනුවට විකල්ප

සංස්කරණය කිරීම සහ සාකච්ඡාකිරීම

If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion.

ටැග් කිරීම

A variety of tags can be added to articles to note the problem. These are listed here. Some of the more common ones include

• {{ශුද්ධපවිත්‍ර}} for poor writing
• {{expert-subject}} for pages needing expert attention
• {{notenglish}} for articles written in a foreign language
• {{npov}} for bias
• {{අසම්පූර්ණ}} for a short article
• {{verify}} for lack of verifiability
• {{merge}} for a small article which could be merged into a larger one.

Pages with an incorrect name can simply be renamed via page movement procedure. Disputes over the name are discussed on the talk page, or listed at requested moves.

Vandalism to a page's content can be reverted by any user.

ඒකාබද්ධ කිරීම

Articles that are short and unlikely to be expanded can often be merged into a larger article or list. For example, information about family members of a celebrity who are not otherwise notable is generally included in, or merged into, the article on that celebrity. Stub pages about minor characters in works of fiction are generally merged into a list article.

If two pages are duplicates or otherwise redundant, one should be merged and redirected to the other, using the most common, or more general page name. This does not require process or formal debate beforehand.

යලියොමු කිරීම

Sometimes an unsuitable article may have a title that would make a useful redirect. In these cases, deletion is not required; any user can boldly redirect to another article. If the change is disputed, an attempt should be made on the talk page to reach a consensus before restoring the redirect.

ඉන්ක්‍යුබේටි කිරීම

Articles which have potential, but which do not yet meet Wikipedia's quality standards, should be moved to the Wikipedia:Article Incubator, where they can continue to be collaboratively edited before either "graduating" to mainspace or ultimately being deleted. The incubator provides several benefits over the previous practice of moving such articles into user space. Primarily, the incubator makes these proto-articles easier to find and edit.

අනෙක් ව්‍යාපෘති

Articles that can never be other than a dictionary article ("dicdef") can be merged as above, or moved to Wiktionary. See Wikipedia:Things to be moved to Wiktionary for instructions. Likewise, articles that are source text (other than copyright violations) should be moved to Wikisource.

සංරක්‍ෂණය කිරීම

Deletion should not be used for archiving a page. The developers have indicated that the deleted pages can be cleared or removed from the database at any time.

මකා දැමීම සඳහා හේතු

මෙයද බලන්න: විකිපීඩියා:ඉක්මන් මකාදැමීමේ උපමානය

මකා දැමීම සඳහා හේතු ලෙසින් පහත දැක්වෙන කරුණු දැක්විය හැකි අතර මීට අමතර කරුණුද තිබිය හැකිය. ඒවා සංවාද මඟින් තීරණය කල යුතු වේ.

• Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising related subject)
• Content not suitable for an encyclopedia
• කර්තෘ හිමිකම් උල්ලංඝන ප්‍රතිපත්තිය
• Hoax articles (but not articles describing a notable hoax)
• Images that are unused, obsolete, violate fair-use policy, or are unencyclopedic
• නුසුදුසු පරිශීලක පිටු
• Inflammatory redirects
• Article information that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources
• All attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed
• Newly-coined words or terms (i.e. neologisms) not discussed in reliable secondary sources about the term, not merely using the term.
• Overcategorization
• Patent nonsense or gibberish
• Redundant templates
• Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
• නාශකවාදය that is not correctable

ක්‍රියාවලිය

There are four basic processes for deletion and one to review and overturn the outcome of these processes.

කර්තෘ හිමිකම් උල්ලංඝනය කිරීම

For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot host content that is in violation of copyright.

• Where to find them: Wikipedia:Copyright problems
• How to do this: For images, add the description page and add {{imagevio}} to the top. For other pages, edit the page to replace its entire content with {{copyvio|url=address of copied material}}. For blatant, whole-page copyright violation, you can simply tag it for speedy deletion with {{db-copyvio|url=...}} after checking that there are no non-copyvio versions in the page history.
• If you disagree: Try to contact the authors of the text or image and see if they are willing to release their work (1) under the GFDL, or (2) into the public domain. Permission to use a work "on Wikipedia only" or "for non-commercial use only" isn't enough, as it is incompatible with our license.
• Renominations: Recreations of copyrighted content are speedily deleted, as below. It is disruptive to persist in recreating such content.

ඉක්මන් මකා දැමීම

Pages can be deleted without any discussion if they meet one of the criteria for speedy deletion. Pages on proposed deletion or deletion discussion (see below) are still subject to speedy deletion, which overrides the other process.

• Where to find them: A list of all pages flagged for speedy deletion can be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
• How to do this: Administrators can delete such pages on sight, even if contested as below. Other editors can request speedy deletion by editing the relevant page to add a speedy deletion template to the top of the page.
• If you disagree: Anyone except a page's creator may contest the speedy deletion of a page by removing the deletion notice from the page. If a page you created is tagged for speedy deletion, you may add the {{hangon}} tag, and either improve the page or explain your reasoning on the relevant talk page. The tag exists to give you some extra time; the page may still be deleted if it meets the speedy deletion criteria. If a page has been speedily deleted and there is disagreement over whether or not it should have been, this is discussed at deletion review, described below.
• Renominations: Either a page fits the speedy deletion criteria or it does not. If there is a dispute over whether a page meets the criteria, the issue is typically taken to deletion discussions, mentioned below.

යෝජිත මකා දැමීම

An editor who believes a page obviously and uncontroversially doesn't belong in an encyclopedia can propose its deletion. These pages can be deleted by any administrator if, after five days, nobody objects to the proposed deletion. Once there is an objection or a deletion discussion, a page may not be proposed for deletion again. This process only applies to pages in the Article, User, and User Talk namespaces.

• Where to find them: A list of all pages flagged for proposed deletion can be found in Category:Proposed deletion, as well as in an automatically generated summary table.
• How to do this: Edit the page to add the following text to the top: {{subst:prod|reason}}, writing your reasoning in the "reason" field.
• If you disagree: Any editor who disagrees with a proposed deletion can simply remove the tag. Even after the page is deleted, any editor can have the page restored by any administrator simply by asking. In both cases the editor is encouraged to fix the perceived problem with the page.
• Renominations: Once the proposed deletion of a page has been objected to by anyone, it may not be proposed for deletion again. If an editor still feels the page ought to be deleted, a deletion discussion should be used, as indicated below.

මකා දැමීම් සාකච්ඡාව

Pages that do not fall in the above three categories may be deleted after community discussion at one of the deletion debates, the results of which may be reviewed at deletion review (see below). This includes contested speedy or proposed deletions. Here, editors who wish to participate can give their opinion on what should be done with the page.

These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants are encouraged to explain their opinion and refer to policy. The discussion lasts at least five days; afterwards, pages are deleted by an administrator if there is consensus to do so. If there is no rough consensus, the page is kept and is again subject to normal editing, merging or redirecting as appropriate.

Because the article deletion process sees a lot of traffic, a nomination for an article that gets little response after five days can be relisted. This does not apply to the other processes.

It is considered inappropriate to ask people outside of Wikipedia to come to the debate in order to sway its outcome. Such comments may be ignored. They are not removed, but may be tagged with {{spa}}, noting that a user "has made few or no other edits". In extreme cases, a deletion debate can be semi-protected.

It is also inappropriate to request deletion because of an editorial dispute. Such disputes are not resolved by deleting the whole page; instead, use dispute resolution.

• Where to find them: There are separate processes for articles, categories, images and media, redirects, templates, stub templates and categories, user categories, and everything else.
• How to do this: Follow the instructions at the top of the relevant process page.
• If you disagree: Go to the relevant process page and explain why you disagree. Do not remove the tag from the page. For more information on this process, read the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.
• Renominations: After a deletion debate concludes and the page is kept, users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating the same page for deletion again, to give editors the time to improve the page. Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome.

මකා දැමීම විමර්ශනය

If you believe a page was wrongly deleted, or should have been deleted but wasn't, or a deletion discussion improperly closed, you should discuss this with the person who performed the deletion, or closed the debate, on their talk page. If this fails to resolve the issue, you can request review of the closure at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

If a page was obviously deleted "out of process" (per this policy), then an admin may choose to undelete it immediately. In such a case, the admin who deleted the page should be informed. However, such undeletions without gaining consensus may be viewed as disruptive, so they should be undertaken with care.

If an article was deleted for lacking content or for having inappropriate content (this applies to most speedy deletions) and you wish to create a better article about the same subject, you can simply go ahead and do so, with no need for review. It is especially wasteful to go to deletion review over an unsourced stub when the alternative of creating a sourced article is available.

The deletion review process is not decided solely by head count. The review normally lasts for five days, sometimes extended for up to ten if the outcome is unclear.

Overturned deletions may go to a deletion discussion if someone still wishes to delete and chooses to nominate.

• Where to find them: Wikipedia:Deletion review
• How to do this: Follow the instructions at the top of the page.
• If you disagree: Go to the review page and explain why you disagree.
• Renominations: As with deletion discussions, a certain amount of time should pass between repeated requests for deletion review, and these requests should be carefully considered in light of policy. Renominations that lack new arguments or new evidence are likely to be closed quickly.

Process interaction

• Issues that are on the wrong process (e.g. templates on the article-deletion page) are simply moved to the proper one.
• A page on deletion review should not be listed on a deletion discussion page until the review closes, and a page on a deletion discussion page should not be listed on deletion review until the discussion closes.
• Deletion discussion trumps proposed deletion, so for a page listed on both, the former takes precedence.
• Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion can be deleted regardless of other circumstances. If a page on a deletion debate is speedied, the debate is closed.
• If it is doubtful whether a page is or is not speedily deletable, a deletion discussion takes precedence. In practice this means that a page that had a deletion discussion resulting in 'keep' or 'no consensus' should not be speedily deleted.
• Pages that violate copyright can be deleted regardless of circumstances or earlier discussion.

Courtesy blanking

From time to time, a discussion about an article will have a majority of its content that, in the judgment of the community may potentially cause harm to some person or to some organization. This harm can range from invasion of privacy, libel or emotional distress. Due consideration should be given if the person or organization in question requests such blanking. In order to avoid having such text in the most recent version and thus be indexed by search engines, the debate will be blanked out of courtesy. For AfDs, the entire debate can be replaced with the afd-privacy template; the actual content remains accessible via the edit history. In more serious cases, the entire history of the page may be deleted. Courtesy blanking, history blanking or oversighting should be rare, and should be performed after due consideration is given to fairness issues.

How to do this: Remove all text from the subpage and then add {{subst:courtesy blanking}}; for AfD, use {{subst:afd-privacy|article|result}} with the correct parameters.

ආශ්‍රිත

• Alternative outlets to recreate deleted articles
• Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
• Deletion guidelines for administrators
• Deletion precedents
• Deletion process
• Deletion review guide
• Guide to deletion
• Introduction to deletion process
• Why was my article deleted?