"GNU Free Documentation License" හි සංශෝධන අතර වෙනස්කම්

The GNU FDL requires that licensees, when printing a document covered by the license, must also include "this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document". This means that if a licensee prints out a copy of an article whose text is covered under the GNU FDL, he or she must also include a copyright notice and a physical printout of the GNU FDL, which is a significantly large document in itself. Worse, the same is required for the standalone use of just one (for example, Wikipedia) image.<ref>[{{cite web|url=http://notablog.notafish.com/index.php/2005/04/21/26-why-the-wikimedia-projects-should-not-use-gfdl-as-a-stand-alone-license-for-images |title=Why the Wikimedia projects should not use GFDL as a stand alone license for images] |publisher=Notablog.notafish.com |date= |accessdate=2011-11-07}}</ref> [[WikitravelWikivoyage]], a web site dedicated to [[free content]] travel guides, chose not to use the GFDL because it considers it unsuitable for short printed texts.<ref>[http[Wikivoyage:Project://wikitravel.org/shared/Why_Wikitravel_isn't_GFDL Why WikitravelWikivoyage isn't GFDL] Wikitravel.org]</ref>