"අර්ථය" හි සංශෝධන අතර වෙනස්කම්
Content deleted Content added
සුළුNo edit summary |
සුළුNo edit summary |
||
1 පේළිය:
කිසියම් වදනක තේරුම.
<br />මේය [[ප්ලේටෝ|'''ප්ලේටෝ''']] ගේ සංවාදයක් අනුව [[දර්ශනවාදයේ ගැටලු|'''දාර්ශනික ගැටලුවකි''']].
<br />උදාහරණයක් ලෙස ඔහුගේ සංවාදයක දැක්වෙන "මඩ" පිළිබද විග්‍රහය සලකමු.
මෙහිදී “මඩ“ යනුවෙන් කුමක් සැලකිය යුත්තේද? යන්න විමසා බැලේ.
මඩ යනු ජලයද නොවේ. මඩ යනු පස් ද නොවේ. මඩ යනු ජලය හා පස් යන දෙකමද නොවේ.
මඩ යනු කුමක්දැයි(සංකල්පීයව) නොහඳුනන්නෙකුට, මඩ ස්පර්ශ කලද, ඒ පිලිබඳ වැටහීමක් වේද? ( මැණික් නොහඳුනන්නාට තිරිවානා මෙන්)
From Plato By R. M Hare
Line 5 ⟶ 15:
We may illustrate this point…from his treatment of the Socratic search for definitions. When Socrates asked questions like 'What is justice?' or 'What is The Just?', there are at least three things which we might take him as wanting. Does he want a definition of a word or of a thing; and if of a thing, of what kind of thing—of something we might come across in this world, or of something which is only available to thought? Let us try constructing a little dialogue to shed light on this question, without making Plato say anything which will not go into Greek.<br />
ENGLISH STRANGER: When Socrates says in the Theaetetus that mud (or clay) is earth mixed with water, is he saying what the word 'mud' means?<br />PLATO: Yes, of course. And what the word means, the thing mud, is what one has to be able to define if one is to show that one knows what mud is. As Socrates says, 'Do you think anybody understands the word for anything, if he doesn't know the thing, what it is?'.<br />
E.S.: But what is this mud he has to know? Is it what one gets on one's boots?<br />
| |||