"විකිපීඩියා:සංගණ්‍යත්වය (පුද්ගලයෝ)" හි සංශෝධන අතර වෙනස්කම්

This notability guideline for biographies<ref name="note1">While this guideline also pertains to small groups of closely related people such as families, co-authors, and co-inventors, it does not cover groups of unrelated people, which are covered by the [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|notability guideline for organizations and companies]].</ref> reflects [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] reached through discussions and reinforced by established practice, and informs decisions on whether an article on a person should be written, merged, deleted or further developed. For advice about ''how'' to write biographical articles, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]].

 

{{shortcut|WP:BASIC}}

A [[person]] is presumed to be '''notable''' if he or she has been the subject of multiple published<ref name="note2">What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad.</ref> [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources|secondary sources]] which are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable]], intellectually independent of each other,<ref name="note3">Sources that are pure derivatives of an original source can be used as references, but do not contribute toward establishing the notability of a subject. "Intellectual independence" requires not only that the content of sources be non-identical, but also that the entirety of content in a published work not be derived from (or based in) another work (partial derivations are acceptable). For example, a speech by a politician about a particular person contributes toward establishing the notability of that person, but multiple reproductions of the transcript of that speech by different news outlets do not. A biography written about a person contributes toward establishing his or her notability, but a summary of that biography lacking an original intellectual contribution does not.</ref> and [[WP:Independent sources|independent of the subject]].<ref name="note4">Autobiography and self-promotion are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. Thus, entries in biographical dictionaries that accept self-nominations (such as the [[Marquis Who's Who]]) do not prove notability.</ref>