|
===What RfA contributors look for and hope to see===
RfA contributors want to see a record of involvement and evidence that you can apply Wikipedia policies calmly, maturely and impartially. What are often looked for areඅරෙ:
*විකිපීඩියා ලිපි සඳහා දක්වන ලද අති මහත් සංස්කරණ ප්රමාණයක් සමගින් '''ප්රබල සංස්කරණ ඉතිහාසයක්'''
*'''Strong edit history''' with plenty of material contributions to Wikipedia articles.
*'''Variedවිවිධ experienceවූ අත්දැකීම් සහිත බවක්'''. RfAs where an editor has mainly contributed in one way (little editing of articles, or little or no participation in AfDs, or little or no participation in discussions about Wikipedia policies and processes, for example) have tended to be more controversial than those where the editor's contributions have been wider.
*'''Userපරිශීලක්යින් interactionසමග අන්යෝන්ය වශයෙන් කටයුතු කිරීමක්'''. Evidence of you talking to other users, on article talk or user talk pages. These interactions need to be helpful and polite.
*'''Trustworthinessවිශ්වසනීය බවක්'''. General reliability as evidence that you would use administrator rights carefully to avoid irreversible damage, especially in the stressful situations that can arise more frequently for administrators.
*'''Helpingආයාසකර withවැඩ choresසඳහා උදව් දී තිබීමක්'''. Evidence that you are already engaging in administrator-like work and debates such as [[Wikipedia:RC patrol|RC Patrol]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]].
*'''Highතත්වයෙන් qualityඋසස් ofලිපි articlesලිවීමක්'''. A good way to demonstrate this is contributing to getting [[Wikipedia:featured articles|articles featured]], although [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good articles]] are also well-regarded.
*'''Observingසමූහික consensusඅදහස්වලට ඇති නම්යශීලී බවක්'''. A track record of working within policy, showing an understanding of [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]].
*'''Editසංස්කරණ summariesසම්පිණ්ඩනය ඇතුල් කිරීමක්'''. Constructive and frequent use of edit summaries is a quality some RfA contributors want to see. If you haven't already set your defaults to force an edit summary with every edit, it is worth doing so before RFA and stating this in your application. See [[Wikipedia:Edit summary]].
*'''Aවාරණයට cleanලක් blockනොවී logසිටීමක්''' as evidence of good editing behavior (if you have any blocks from more than twelve months ago, people will expect an explanation as to how your editing has changed to make this unlikely to happen again).
These points are not mandatory and there are always exceptions, but if you think back over your contributions and any of these is missing, it may be better to broaden your experience '''before''' an RfA.
| 
